Charles Beard Framing Constitution Thesis

Charles Beard Framing Constitution Thesis-56
Roughly stated, these books argue that during the period after the Revolutionary War most state constitutions were highly democratic, at least for the era.At the same time, the country was suffering a post-war financial crisis that was ruinous to artisans and small farmers.

Tags: Writing A Introduction For A Research PaperSteps To A Business PlanPaid To Write College EssaysEssays For Peace Corps ApplicationSolve Word Problems CalculatorArgumentative Essay InternetHow To Write A Play In An EssayIntroduction To A Research Paper SampleEssay Writing For Mba

Because of this, I would say that Beard was most likely mistaken.

Charles Beard’s suggested that the Constitution was a document that was only created to protect the framer’s wealth.

He then compared this to a small group of creditors protecting themselves against the masses that owed them money.

This is also why the constitution had clauses limiting the states control over money lending and circulation.

The Constitution was drafted by framers that took a lot of time and effort to make a document that has held this nation together for centuries.

The But by the law, even though the whites were the majority, they couldn’t control the blacks. Make it your voice, thus conversational, but at the same time the intelligent-and-school version of you. For example, “Charles Beard’s belief on the Constitution was that the Constitution was a document that was only created to protect the framer’s wealth” could just be: “Charles Beard believed that the Constitution was created only to protect the framers’ wealth.” * The fluff, as mentioned earlier, really obfuscates your point and makes the essay hard to read. Don’t just say what the framers thought (majority rule gave power to the majority and minority) and say what caused them to think it (Shay’s Rebellion).Beard believed that the reason why the rich framers wanted to protect against majority rule was to prevent the majority to overthrow the rich.Beard did manage to fit most of the framers under “rich” categories such as lawyers, landowners, and merchants.But, he failed to realize that the framers limited majority rule to protect the rights of minorities, also.The framers attempted to perfect the constitution by protecting the minority while giving majority some power.There is more evidence to support his theories, especially since we can see how well the constitution has worked since its creation.Also there were many members of the Constitutional Conventions who were not wealthy land owners and there were many wealthy men who opposed the Constitution.Beard thought that the constitution was just a document written by the rich, whose only motive was protecting their wealth and property.Beard said that these rich men included landholders, creditors, merchants, public bondholders, and wealthy lawyers.Especially considering how long the constitution has lasted and how much changed in regard to everyday life has since then.They did an incredible job at making the constitution a long lasting and effective document. I think that they wrote these documents as a debate, and that Roche most likely won.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Charles Beard Framing Constitution Thesis

The Latest from bolserdce.ru ©