Charles Beard Economic Interpretation Constitution Thesis

Charles Beard Economic Interpretation Constitution Thesis-11
Professors in the constitutional law academy are the most intent on seeing that Beard stay buried.They seem to fear that if Beard came back to life the Constitution would become a bastard anti-democratic document, lose its political legitimacy, and their enterprise of liberal versus conservative debate over the real meanings of the document would go into bankruptcy.“[Hamilton] was the colossal genius of the new system. that he had little to do with the formation of the Constitution [at Philadelphia], but it was his organizing ability that made it a real instrument bottomed on all the substantial interests of the time. It has been charged that he leaned always on the side of the financial interests against the public as represented in the government; but it must be remembered that at the time the new system went into effect, the public had no credit and financiers were not willing to forego their gains and profits for an abstraction. [Hamilton] was swayed throughout the period of the formation of the Constitution by large policies of government -- not by any of the personal interests so often ascribed to him.” But if gatherings in the recent past on Beard are an accurate guide, the major thrust will be not to celebrate his work.

Tags: Business Plan Template For KidsMake Your Own Writing PaperBest College Admissions EssaysIntroduction Dissertation OgmDiploma Thesis DefensePrejudice Essays To Kill A MockingbirdPoem EssayThesis Of EssayOrganizational Culture Assignment

The tragedy however is that Beard’s has gone from beyond critical challenge to below intellectual respect without ever being adequately understood.

Contrary to the stereotype that still emanates from the top of the history profession and the constitutional law academy,* Beard in was not sympathetic to the Jeffersonian or anti-Federalist populist traditions.

In short, he seemed more tolerant of "men of property" (Beard 1944, 120-137).

Was it because two world wars had changed his world-view?

In any event, whether for war-time propaganda reasons, or for the reasons wrought by intellectual evolution, Charles Beard near the end of his life had softened his once-adversarial stance.

My only important criticism of Beard is that economic interpretations of history that exclude all others, of the kind that Beard wrote in his earliest years, are at best one-dimensional.Spatial restraint forces me to be brief; suffice it to say that the view of the Constitution offered by Beard was a much mellower view than the one offered by him a bit more than thirty years earlier.He discussed the various features of the document and extolled its virtues.Barely heard but basically ignored will be geeky econometric voices advising caution against another hasty burial.Their inconvenient findings are that according to contemporary quantitative techniques economic self-interest indeed played a major role in determining support for or opposition to the Constitution.Had he been cauterized by the barbarism of twentieth-century global war?Or had he merely begun to be more tolerant, as so often happens as people reach the ends of their lives?While largely maintaining his reform stance on the domestic front, Beard developed a “continentalist” stance on foreign policy that condemned the modern progressive tradition of not just Woodrow Wilson but also Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin Delano Roosevelt for pushing America out of its isolation into military conflict in Europe and Asia.Yet while somewhat downplaying Hamilton’s role, Beard still maintained his neo-Federalist view in support of the Constitution.Beard also stands alone among the progressive historians inasmuch as he wrote a consensus-style book in collaboration with his wife.It was entitled The Beards'' Basic History of the United States and was published in 1944. ) seconded many of Jameson''s notions of the end of primogeniture, disestablishment of the Anglican church, and so on.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Charles Beard Economic Interpretation Constitution Thesis

  • An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the
    Reply

    The Constitution, Beard argued, was designed to reverse the radical democratic tendencies^ Robert Livingston Schuyler, "Forrest McDonald's Critique of the Beard Thesis," Journal of SouthernEllen Nore, "Charles A. Beard's Economic Interpretation of the Origins of the Constitution," This.…

  • The Beard Thesis and the Seinfeld Defense Law &
    Reply

    In this, its centennial year, Charles Beard’s 1913 An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States retains its hold on both theBut it may be time for those who respect the Framers to acknowledge at least one deep vein of truth in Beard’s thesis and reply with an even deeper one.…

  • Charles Beard - Conservapedia Constitution
    Reply

    Beard in An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States 1913 and An Economic Interpretation of Jeffersonian Democracy 1915 extended Becker's thesis down to 1800 in terms of class conflict. To Beard, the Constitution was a counter-revolution, set up by rich bond.…

  • Charles beard's interpretation of the constitution -
    Reply

    In 1913, Beard published his most influential book, An Economic Interpretation of the U. S. formulating this interpretation, Beard drew from the scholarship of another famous historian named Carl L. Becker. Becker had argued the American Revolution really consisted of two.…

  • Charles Beard and the constitution a crit. analysis of "An
    Reply

    Charles Beard and the constitution a crit. analysis of "An economic interpretation of the constitution."…

  • The Founders, the Constitution, and the Historians.
    Reply

    How could Charles Beard have erred so badly in arguing that the Constitution. Founders was Charles Beard in An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution. Beard's thesis, seemingly well researched, was presented in a.…

  • Beard-Economic Interpretation of US Constitution
    Reply

    This is Charles A. Beard's highly controversial book An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of The United States 1965 whichBeard's original thesis from 1913 remains that the forming of the US Constitution was an effort by the economic well-to-do of the newly formed American social class.…

  • The Interpretation of Constitutional History, or
    Reply

    In An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States, published in 1913, Charles A. Beard arguedA century after the publication of An Economic Interpretation, one can fairly conclude both that the book was "seminal" and that subsequent scholarship has "undermined Beard's thesis."…

The Latest from bolserdce.ru ©