If life were truly similar to a wheel of fortune you would have a lot less control over our choices and the consequences would be unpredictable.As mentioned, analogies are used to make logical arguments and comparisons.Instead, analogies are strong rhetorical devices used to make rational arguments and support ideas by showing connections and comparisons between dissimilar things.Tags: How To Write A Case Study Analysis PaperRenaissance Essay1000 Words EssaySolved Algebra ProblemsBusiness Plan ForecastMexico Drug War Photo Essay
However, they are actually very different, specifically because an analogy is a rhetorical device, not a figure of speech.
While similes and metaphors are generally quite short and simple, analogies are more elaborate and explanatory, because they support arguments.
This revolutionized education and made possible an era of widespread literacy and democratic thought.“Evolution is a blind giant who rolls a snowball down a hill. When they see the result they marvel at the monster ball and wonder how the contriving of it came to be originally thought out and planned.
Whereas there was no such planning, there was only a law: the ball once started, all the circumstances that happened to lie in its path would help to build it, in spite of themselves.” (Mark Twain, Tales of Wonder)Here, Forrest Gump shares a very memorable analogy, beginning with the simile “life was like a box of chocolates.” But, this is an analogy because it gives further support and explanation for the comparison, showing that life has many choices and surprises, just like a box of chocolate. Oswald, a standup comedian, is poking fun at articles about him by comparing that statement to something obviously commonplace, showing that the argument that he “loved to laugh” is about as strong as saying he gets hungry for food. They sparkle and shine when the sun is out, but when the darkness sets in, their true beauty is revealed only if there is a light from within.
Again, it’s important to remember that metaphors and similes are figures of speech, while analogies are NOT.
However, they are very similar to analogies in that they both depend on some kind of similarity between two different objects.
Gunpowder revolutionized war and brought down old hierarchies and strategies – after the introduction of the gun, war would never be the same.
Similarly, the invention of the printing press allowed books and newspapers to reach vast audiences that otherwise had no access to the written word. They adhere without intention, and without foreseeing what is to result.
Therefore, as the argument goes, if a medicine works on mice, it should also work on humans (or at least it’s ready for human testing).
In a figurative analogy, you’re simply drawing a comparison between two unrelated things to highlight a certain characteristic; you’re not necessarily saying that the things are Take, for example, the wheel of fortune example.